1keachday

It's today people... See you then... #1keachday

Rules: -Follow us -Answer only once -Add the hashtag #1keachday with your prediction -Deadline: 31/05/25, 8pm -First to predict wins 1k Cash -Other correct winners will be shortlisted for N20,000 live draw tomorrow -Check our other social platforms - @1keachday T & C Apply #1keachday N/B: FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THE AFOREMENTIONED RULES IS AN AUTOMATIC DISQUALIFICATION. THERE WILL BE NO RESOLUTIONS & WE WILL NOT TOLERATE COMPLAINTS. Thank you.

Rules: -Follow us -Answer only once -Add the hashtag #1keachday with your prediction -Deadline: 25/05/25, 4pm -First to predict wins 1k Cash -Other correct winners will be shortlisted for N20,000 live draw at month end -Check our other social platforms - @1keachday T & C Apply #1keachday N/B: FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THE AFOREMENTIONED RULES IS AN AUTOMATIC DISQUALIFICATION. THERE WILL BE NO RESOLUTIONS & WE WILL NOT TOLERATE COMPLAINTS. Thank you.

Rules: -Follow us -Answer only once -Add the hashtag #1keachday with your prediction -Deadline: 21/05/25, 8pm -First to predict wins 1k Cash -Other correct winners will be shortlisted for N20,000 live draw at month end -Check our other social platforms (IG, X, FB) - @1keachday T & C Apply #1keachday N/B: FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THE AFOREMENTIONED RULES IS AN AUTOMATIC DISQUALIFICATION. THERE WILL BE NO RESOLUTIONS & WE WILL NOT TOLERATE COMPLAINTS. Thank you.

Hey y'all. Good evening. Today's trivia is simply based on how fast you are & the fastest person for today's trivia wins N1,000 Cash.

Rules: -Answer only once -Add the hashtag #1keachday with your prediction -Deadline: 18/05/25, 4:30pm -First to predict wins 1k Cash -Other correct winners will be shortlisted for N20,000 live draw at month end -Check our other social platforms (FB, X, Blog) - @1keachday T & C Apply #1keachday N/B: FAILURE TO ADHERE TO THE AFOREMENTIONED RULES IS AN AUTOMATIC DISQUALIFICATION. THERE WILL BE NO RESOLUTIONS & WE WILL NOT TOLERATE COMPLAINTS. Thank you.

  Eccentric trillionaire J.P. Weatherby's will states: "My entire fortune shall go to whichever of my heirs deserves it least." The seven potential inheritors include a nun who works with the poor but judges others morally, a philanthropist who donates millions but only for tax breaks, a self-made billionaire who employs thousands but exploits workers, and a homeless man who shares his meager earnings but has criminal convictions. The probate judge sighs deeply as lawyers present arguments about "worthiness." Debate: How does one objectively measure "least deserving"? Would true humility mean not accepting the money? Could this entire clause be void for vagueness?

  Your 70-year-old future self suddenly appears, urgently borrowing $10,000 cash with a written promise to repay "when you become me." They vanish with the money. Thirty years later, you finally build a time machine. As you prepare to travel back to your younger self, you discover the aged promissory note in your pocket. Your spouse argues this creates a paradox - if you repay the debt, you'd have no reason to time travel, but if you don't, you'll be violating your own contract. Debate: Does this constitute a binding agreement across timelines? Is the debt canceled since you ultimately paid yourself? Would not repaying make you a thief from yourself?

  A terminally ill neighbor hands you a signed lottery ticket worth $500 million with his dying breath, whispering: "It's yours... but if you cash it, someone you love will die within a year." Medical experts confirm he was of sound mind. The ticket expires in 90 days. Financial advisors show you could anonymously donate most of it. Your spouse says it's just superstition, while your priest warns against tempting fate. A private investigator finds the previous three winners of this lottery all suffered family tragedies. Debate: Is this a psychological test, supernatural warning, or mere coincidence? Would donating the money "break the curse"? Should potential future good outweigh personal risk?

  As the sole eyewitness to a brutal assault, you shock the courtroom by stating: "I clearly saw everything that night, but I absolutely refuse to identify who did it." The judge rules your entire testimony inadmissible due to its partial nature, resulting in the defendant's acquittal. Three months later, you come forward with a bombshell confession - you had lied under oath about seeing the crime at all. Now the original suspect is suing for wrongful prosecution, the victim's family demands justice, and the DA wants to charge you with perjury. Debate: Is withholding part of the truth equivalent to lying under oath? Should you be punished more for the original lie or the subsequent confession? Does justice require revealing why you lied?